Create Post
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 


$3.3B MAMBILLA DEAL DISMANTLED: ICC VICTORY EXPOSES $500k LINK TO ATIKU'S EX-WIFE The Breakdowns: An International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) International Court of Arbitration tribunal sitting in Paris delivered a major ruling in favor of the Federal Government of Nigeria against Sunrise Power and Transmission Company Limited (SPTCL) over the long-disputed Mambilla Hydroelectric Power Project. ​The key facts, financial figures, and specific findings highlighting the payment involving former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s ex-wife, Jennifer Douglas Abubakar, break down as follows: ​1. Core Verdict & Financial Claims Dismissed: ​Total Claim Rejected: The ICC tribunal dismissed claims brought by Sunrise Power seeking between $2.35 billion and $3.38 billion (as well as an underlying settlement claim of $680 million plus interest) in damages against Nigeria. ​Outcome: The tribunal dismissed all claims by Sunrise and held that the company was not entitled to compensation, relieving the Nigerian government of massive potential liabilities. ​Scope of Project: The legal dispute centered on the 3,000 MW – 3,960 MW Mambilla Hydroelectric Power Project located in Taraba State, Nigeria. 2. The $500,000 Financial Transfer & Findings: ° ​The Payment Amount: The tribunal highlighted a specific wire transfer of $500,000. ° ​Date of Transaction: The transfer took place on January 30, 2003. ° ​The Originator: The payment was wired by Leno Adesanya (Chairman/CEO of Sunrise Power and Transmission Company Limited). ° ​The Recipient: The funds were sent to Jennifer Douglas Abubakar, who was married at the time to Atiku Abubakar (then Vice President of Nigeria). ° ​Tribunal Findings on Corrupt Practices: ° ​The ICC tribunal examined this transaction during proceedings regarding allegations of fraud and illegal procurement processes linked to the initial award of the Mambilla contract. ° ​Adesanya did not deny making the transfer. While Sunrise maintained the payment was unrelated to corrupt influence, the tribunal reviewed it within the context of corrupt practices, conflicts of interest, and illicit financial flows surrounding the procurement of government contracts during that era. 3. Background of the Legal Dispute ​2003 Contract Award: Sunrise Power claimed it was originally awarded a $6 billion Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) contract for the Mambilla project in May 2003. ° ​Subsequent Revocation & Litigation: Successive Nigerian administrations halted and restructured the deal due to procedural flaws, lack of competitive bidding, and corruption allegations, prompting Sunrise to take Nigeria to international arbitration. ° ​Settlement Disputes: Sunrise had previously signed settlement agreements with past government representatives (including a $200 million settlement deal in 2020), which later collapsed and culminated in the ICC proceedings. 4. Strategic Impact: ​Clearing Legal Impediments: The dismissal of Sunrise’s claims clears the largest ongoing legal hurdle preventing Nigeria from partnering with fresh international investors and development banks (such as the Export-Import Bank of China) to execute the Mambilla Hydroelectric Power Plant. Victory to Nigeria Victory to Nigerians. Victory to President Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
214
  8 hours
 
 
 


 
 
 
 Who to follow
 
 
 
About   Topics   Advertise   Privacy Policy   Terms of Service  

© Convas8 Media Enterprise